Breaking News

Loranne Ausley & Correctional Officers Blast Atwater's "Prison to Nowhere" for Shutting Down Prison Work Squads

$24 Million in Private Prison Operating Costs have Forced the Department of Corrections to Shut Down 71 Prison Work Squads

Tallahassee, FL -- Florida Chief Financial Officer Candidate Loranne Ausley today stood with members of the law enforcement community outside of the Central Florida Reception Center to blast Senate President Jeff Atwater for his role in forcing the Department of Corrections to cut 71 Prison Work Squads. Last year the Department of Corrections public work squad program, utilized by cities, counties, state agencies, and non-profits for construction, recycling, ground maintenance, etc. saved taxpayers $35.7 million.

"Senate President Jeff Atwater's 'prison to nowhere' is yet another product of the broken system in Tallahassee, and once again Florida taxpayers are stuck with the bill," said Ausley. "Floridians are fed up with politicians who play by their own rules with our money. Whether it's the "Tallahassee Taj Mahal," the "Prison to Nowhere" or an airport hanger for a political contributor, politicians in Tallahassee need to be held accountable."

The $24 million budgeted for the prison work squads is now being used to open the Blackwater River Correctional Institution, or "Prison to Nowhere." The "Prison to Nowhere," is operated by the GEO Group, a private, for-profit prison operator in Boca Raton, who already received $110 million in appropriations to build the prison. Earlier this year, over objections from the Florida Department of Corrections, Senate President Jeff Atwater supported the last minute attempt to shut down two state-run prisons in order to funnel prisoners into the private, and mostly empty private prison in Milton.

"It is bad for the people of Florida when elected leaders, like Jeff Atwater, put corporate profit before public safety," stated Jim Baiardi, President of the State Correctional Officers Chapter of the Florida Police Benevolent Association. "As Senate President, Jeff Atwater placed the needs of special interest groups, like the GEO Group, ahead of the taxpayers, ahead of public safety, ahead of government oversight, and ahead of government conducted in the sunshine. Simply put - Having Jeff Atwater as Florida's Chief Financial Officer is like having the fox guarding the hen house."

More than $870,000 in financial contributions have flowed to Senate President Jeff Atwater and the Republican Party of Florida over the last ten years from the corrections and private prison industry, the GEO Group, it's executive management team, and its various political entities.
 
 

 
Where the House and Senate budgets stand as of April 2, 2010

The PBA has been closely following the budgetary process and wants to let our members know what how each budget proposal will affect you. First, both the Senate and the House vote on their own versions of the budget. They will meet over the next couple of weeks to work out the differences.

Currently the Senate budget is $2.7 billion more than the House's. The reason is that the House does not include supplemental federal Medicaid money, does not assume that all 67 county school boards will levy an additional property tax increase to make up budget shortfalls, and the House does not include money from a gambling compact with the Seminole Tribe of Florida.

The Senate budget includes a .25 percent of one-percent contribution for state employees to their retirement plans, including DROP accounts. FRS has been non-contributory for 35 years; this provision would change that principle-with higher contributions sure to follow. The House budget does not include this provision. Meanwhile, the House budget (HB 5701) eliminates the health insurance subsidy (HIS) for current and future retirees. On April 1st the House originally voted down HB 5701 57 to 59 (click here for floor vote Session Sequence No: 661). Fifteen Republicans crossed the aisle and voted with all Democrats against the bill.

After a temporary recess and some strong arm-twisting of Republican members who originally voted against the bill, HB 5701 was reconsidered and then passed 63 to 56 (click here for floor vote Session Sequence No: 671). Members who originally voted no then changed to yes on killing HIS are: Ed Homan, Paige Kreegel, Charles McBurney and Trudi Williams. Representative Baxter Troutman originally voted yes for the bill but later voted against killing the subsidies.

The House budget also includes a 3 percent salary cut to state workers at the discretion of agency heads. This cut is not in the Senate proposal.

As our State Correctional Officers are well aware, the Florida PBA successfully killed a Senate proposal to close a number of public prisons to fill a private prison, killed a move to privatize a current state-run prison, and killed a proposal to privatize work release centers.

The budget is not done and we need all our members to be aware of PBA requests for assistance in contacting legislators and to take whatever action the PBA calls on you to do. We cannot overstress how important this is. For example, if it weren't for all your calls and emails, we would never have stopped the Senate prison privatization proposal.

Florida PBA's lobbying staff, assisted by PBA leaders from around the state, have been at the Capitol since Day 1 fighting these bad proposals. We will be there to the end to stop this damage to public employees.

David Murrell
PBA Executive Director
 

 
PRISON PLAN ASSAILED AS "SNEAKY", MISLEADING

By DARA KAM, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Updated: 10:13 p.m. Saturday, March 27, 2010 — Posted: 6:30 p.m. Saturday, March 27, 2010

After repeatedly emphasizing his commitment to “open and
transparent” government during a committee meeting Thursday
evening, Senate budget chief J.D. Alexander attached a last-minute
prison-privatization amendment to the state’s spending bill without
any warning to anyone it would affect, including the Department of
Corrections.

Alexander’s proposal to open a privately run prison near the
Blackwater River in the Panhandle would shutter at least two staterun prisons and put 639 prison guards out of work, the Lakeland Republican told the committee.

His plan also would privatize an unidentified existing 1,350-bed
prison, bringing the number of guards who would get pink slips up to 1,400, according to the amendment.

Alexander says that shutting down prisons to fill a 2,224-bed
facility to be run by Boca Raton-based Geo Group would save the
state about $20 million a year.

And it would put into use the state-of-the-art, energy-efficient
Blackwater prison the state paid Geo $110 million to build near
Milton in a deal slipped into the 2008 budget by state Rep. Ray
Sansom before he became House speaker. Sansom later stepped
down from that position in disgrace.

But corrections officials object to the plan and say Alexander
overestimates the state’s potential savings by going private.
Geo is now negotiating with the Department of Management
Services to run Blackwater, but with a major hitch: The state doesn’t have enough inmates to fill it without closing other prisons.  That’s because the state overestimated how many inmates
would be incarcerated and the prison population is declining
despite historically high unemployment.

Alexander based his estimate on a $65-a-day rate for inmates
in state-run prisons and $41 a day that Geo says it can charge for
Blackwater, a savings of $24 a day for each of the 2,224 inmates
who would be housed at the facility.

But corrections officials say the savings would be about $9 million
— less than half Alexander’s $20 million estimate — because
their average daily rate is $52 while the private prison’s costs would depend on what kind of inmates were locked up at Blackwater.  “We don’t believe this is the right way to open Blackwater,” said DOC spokeswoman Gretl Plessinger.

Blackwater was originally supposed to house mentally ill and
seriously sick inmates who cost more to care for, but documents
show that the state is now negotiating with Geo to care for inmates
who are the cheapest and easiest to supervise.

“As discussed earlier today, we wanted to provide you with a
revised pricing for the Blackwater Facility if it were to house 2,224
M-1/M-2/S-1 inmates,” an unidentified Geo official wrote on March
19 to Michael Weber, chief of private prison monitoring at the
Department of Management Services.

M-1, M-2 and S-1 inmates are relatively healthy and have no
mental health issues.

The $41-a-day price goes up to $45 if the 2,224-bed facility
does not run at full capacity, according to the e-mail.

But DMS spokeswoman Linda McDonald declined to say who
would run Blackwater because negotiations aren’t finished.
And she would not say what type of inmates would be housed
there.

“That is not a decision that DMS makes. Ultimately it could be
the legislature, but DOC is certainly involved, too,” McDonald said.
Plessinger said it is unlikely that all the inmates from one
prison could be transferred to Blackwater because most prisons
have a mix of classes of prisoners. She also said corrections officials have no idea which prisons will be shut down.

Deal “sneaky,” some say.

Alexander’s late-filed amendment is the latest twist in a deal
worked out in secrecy for at least two years since Sansom set it into motion.

Sansom resigned his speakership in 2009 after being indicted
on charges including grand theft related to a deal he tucked into the 2008 budget. He is facing trial on charges of steering tax money to build a jet hangar for developer Jay Odom, who donated nearly $1 million to Sansom and the state Republican Party, at a Panhandle college that hired him the day he became speaker.

In the same budget, the Santa Rosa County Republican also
slipped in a $110 million appropriation to build a private prison in his home county.

Alexander’s privatization plan was never discussed during the
Senate Criminal and Civil Justice Appropriations Committee meetings where prison spending is usually decided.

The committee chairman, Victor Crist, voted against the
amendment Thursday. He said the potential savings by privatizing
the prisons could not only put people out of work but also devastate the rural communities in which the prisons are based.

“They generally are the primary if not the only employer there.
If you shut it down, you could be shutting down a town. All of a sudden, everyone there could be out of work,” said Crist, R-Tampa.  “How do they sell their homes? How do they relocate even if they got a job with a private prison 300 miles away?”

And, Crist said, the laid-off prison guards — whose annual
salaries average between $30,000 and $35,000 — could wind up
costing the state more if they sign up for state services for the
unemployed.

“Sometimes a dollar saved upfront could cost you two dollars
behind,” he said.

Alexander said he introduced the amendment because Crist
refused to do so and as Senate budget chairman he wants to save
money on prisons to help close a $3.2 billion spending gap.

“Many states have reduced their incarceration costs by using
privatization,” said Alexander, R-Lake Wales.

He estimated Florida could save up to $700 million a year by
privatizing each of its 62 prisons.

But Police Benevolent Association President Jim Baiardi
said Alexander kept his plan quiet to avoid public debate on
the controversial issue.

“It’s been sneaky. Very sneaky. It’s almost like it’s been
done in the dead of the night. So much for open government,”
Baiardi said, calling it a giveaway for Geo.

“I don’t understand how they can say that,” Alexander said.
“The reality is we’ve got a brand-new prison that the state directed
and used taxpayers’ monies to build. I think putting that prison
online, saving the money, saving the maintenance costs, is something that only makes good financial sense for the people of Florida.”


STATE WORKERS STAND TO LOSE IN BUDGET
Published: Sunday, March 21, 2010 at 1:00 a.m.

By LLOYD DUNKELBERGER
H-T Capital Bureau

From their paychecks to their pensions to their very jobs, state workers have a lot to lose as the Legislature tries to resolve a $3 billion budget shortfall.

Myriad cost-cutting proposals aimed at state workers are being weighed by lawmakers. Cutting pay by 3 percent. Paying more for health insurance. Limiting retirement benefits. And for some workers the most ominous threat: losing their jobs. Sen. Al Lawson, D-Tallahassee, who represents Leon County, which alone has more than 20,000 state workers, said he fears lawmakers are looking to balance the new state budget "on the backs of state workers."

"Workers out there are very nervous," Lawson said. "They work hard for the state. And it appears that when revenue is short, they want to dump it on them."

Significant savings can be realized, in part, from the sheer size of the state work force. Including university employees, the state has about 169,000 positions in its annual $66 billion budget. Most of the changes are aimed at about 127,000 workers who range from state agency heads to correctional officers to health care workers to court employees to child abuse investigators.

Yet while lawmakers look to wring savings from the work force, Florida already has a lean state payroll compared with other states. In 2008, the average state government had 216 workers per 10,000 population. Florida had 118 -- ranking it next to last in the nation, according to the annual survey by the state Department of Management Services. The average national payroll expenditures for state workers were $69 per resident, but only $38 in Florida.

But Florida is generous to state workers -- in some areas. More than 26,000 state employees -- including legislators and Gov. Charlie Crist -- get free health insurance. Some of those workers received free insurance in exchange for giving up job-protection rights under a management overhaul led by former Gov. Jeb Bush.

Employees who pay for their health coverage get bargain rates -- $50 a month for individuals or $180 for families. State workers do not contribute to their pensions -- with the state picking up the entire cost. Some workers in "special risk" or "senior management" categories accrue their pension benefits at higher rate than average workers. And their pension benefits are not capped -- meaning some, if they work long enough, can retire with their full paycheck.

Those benefits come as the cost to the state -- and ultimately taxpayers -- continues to rise for health care and pension payments.

Against that backdrop, legislative leaders say state workers, like all other state government entities, will have to bear some of the budget-cutting burden this year.

"Everything is on the table," said Rep. Dean Cannon, R-Winter Park, who is in line to become the next House speaker.

Senate budget chairman J.D. Alexander, R-Lake Wales, said while many of those proposals are under consideration, some of the impact may be mitigated if Florida receives an additional $1 billion in federal aid for Medicaid next year -- an event most state officials expect to happen.

But Alexander has also voiced support for some of the cost-cutting measures, including having all state employees pay for their health insurance.

"What's good for the goose is good for the gander," he said. Lawson said it was unfair to look at making workers pay more for their health care and pensions given that they haven't had a raise in some four years. He also said the workers who gave up their job protections in exchange for free insurance should be considered.

"You're reneging on a promise," Lawson said. "They need to honor that."

As the House and Senate head for an April 1 floor vote on their budget bills, the most immediate threat to emerge for state workers is the House plan for a 3 percent pay cut for all workers, including Gov. Charlie Crist, who would lose nearly $4,000 in annual pay. State workers are in their fourth year without a pay increase.

The average pay for the bulk of state workers in 2008 was $38,517 -- down by $322 from a year earlier, according to the DMS survey.

Last year, lawmakers tried to cut 2 percent from the paychecks of state workers earning more than $45,000 a year. But Crist vetoed the measure. Layoffs could be possible for some employees.

The initial House budget bill gives agency heads the flexibility of offsetting the 3 percent pay cut by making other managerial moves, including laying off some workers. The Senate has considered eliminating more than 1,800 correctional officer positions -- which appear to be vacant.

But union officials, who represent the officers, say inevitably the elimination of "vacancies" often involves actual employees. The House has considered eliminating some 450 positions in community corrections operations. Lawmakers are looking at eliminating positions and curbing health and pension benefits because of the savings.

For instance, requiring all state workers to pay for their health insurance would save $46 million in the new budget, according to an analysis by Florida TaxWatch, a nonprofit government watchdog group. TaxWatch also said requiring new state employees to contribute 5 percent of their pay -- a rate common in other states -- to fund their pensions could save the state $245 million a year.

Reducing the accrual of pension benefits for some workers could save more than $200 million when fully implemented in the next few years. Others argue that the pension and health care benefits help offset the generally lower pay that most state workers receive, such as correctional officers who qualify for the higher pension accrual rate but start their jobs at about $28,000 a year.

George Sheldon, secretary of the Department of Children and Families, one of the state's largest agencies, said he hopes to avoid layoffs in this year's budget debate. He cited several examples where his employees have excelled.

He said some 4,000 workers were involved in turning around Florida's food stamp error rate from one of the worst in the country to one of the best, earning the state an additional $13.5 million.

Sheldon is urging lawmakers to give those workers a special one-time $500 bonus -- a move that Governor Crist supports. After the recent earthquake in Haiti, Sheldon's agency set up two special centers in the Orlando area and Miami to handle more than 20,000 American citizens living in Haiti who wanted to be repatriated.

"We had over 1,200 of our employees volunteering to do 12-hour shifts," Sheldon said. "Some of them did the 12-hour shifts and then went in and did their regular jobs."

Sheldon said the workers find motivation in their jobs beyond the pay and benefits. "Folks that take these jobs do it because they love it," he said. "There is a certain satisfaction that they get out of it."

H-T Capital Bureau correspondent Gary Fineout contributed to this report.


DEATH WATCH ON FOR PENSIONS
March 23, 2010
Posted by Mary Ellen Klas on March 23, 2010 in Florida Legislature

Death watch on for pensions bills that thwart powerful police and fire lobbies
This is the week we start the death watch for high profile, controversial and even good government bills that are running out of time. Top on our list today is a series of bills aimed at reining in the lucrative pension benefits of many police, fire and special risk employees. The bills, proposed by Rep. Juan Zapata, R-Miami, Rep. Tom Grady, R-Naples and Sen. Mike Bennett, R-Bradenton, also revise the retirement plans for future state and local government employees.

Bennett’s bill is the only one to get a hearing but it was also watered down and amended when it came up today before the Senate Community Affairs Committee, which he chairs. Then, as dozens of firefighters and police sat in the crowded meeting room, it was postponed – some speculating that it’s because he didn’t have the votes.

Over in the House, Grady’s bill, which he had planned to amend to match Bennett’s amendment, didn’t get included on the list of bills scheduled to be on the agenda before Rep. Rob Schenck’s Governmental Affairs Policy Committee when it meets Wednesday and Thursday.

Bennett would require that future hires be given retirement plans that give benefits equal to the base salary for the last five years of employment but no longer include what they've earned in overtime, unused leave and other additions governments have agreed to add in the last several years. New hires would also be offered only defined contribution plans, not defined benefit plans, and cities and counties would have to report annually their pension fund liabilities and contributions.

Bennett was blunt about the turmoil these measures are facing.

“Anybody who wants to run for reelection never wants to go against the firefighters or the PBA,’’ he said. “Sometimes things that are politically correct are certainly not politically popular. But if you go back home if they get a pension plan that will fund them for the rest of their lives after only 30 years and at age 45. I think they would say no. Does their pension plan cover all their overtime? They would say no.’’

But, he admits, that while the rich benefits offered to many special risk employees are not popular, neither is thwarting them. “I’m hoping someday to run for Congress and it’s not going to be popular for me. But would they rather do that or bankrupt the cities and the state? We have to bring it more in line with what the private sector pays.’’

David Murrell of the Police Benevolent Association confirms this assessment.

“We’re keeping a list of who's naughty and nice,’’ he said of the session. “I call it my Santa Claus list.”

Meanwhile, Bennett said his bill will be back before the committee next week and he hopes his fellow legislators see things his way: “While it’s not popular, it’s something we have to do.”

While pension reform is hurting, effort to fund the pension plan are still alive. On Tuesday, the Houses' full budget committee approved raising state employer's share of the retirement plan $294 million and the county share $166 million to bridge the gap. They are also asking for another actuarial study for the fiscal year July 1, 2009 to July 1 2010, to determine if there is any remaining budget gap.
 
 

 

Site designed and hosted by Southeast Web Group